Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA NVS 810

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Boost Clock1033MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +441%
5.728 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Nov 2015
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
68W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GM107
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Maxwell
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy