Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +5407%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2011
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
80
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cedar
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy