AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon R7 350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+599%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jul 2016
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
