Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FireMV 2260

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FireMV 2260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +26775%
10.75 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV620
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy