Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +33493%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV620
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy