Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +1035%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 450 OEM
0.947 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2016
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy