Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (230W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +24%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2015
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM
2048bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
64
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Fiji
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy