Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (2200MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +495%
20.28 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
1792
288
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy