Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +92081%
20.28 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4608
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G98
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy