Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +4786%
20.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
28
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy