Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4488 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +11971%
20.28 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
120
288
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
45W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV630
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy