Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +2041%
20.28 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 450 OEM
0.947 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2016
Radeon Pro
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
512
288
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy