Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +260%
20.28 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
2816
288
TMUs
176
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
580W
700 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy