Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7300X +861%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
-
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2304
Shading Units
240
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
289W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT200B
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy