Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 48 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 48 +880%
7.373 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
940 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

76.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
14.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
460.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Topaz
Vega 10 PRO
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy