AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64
+9434%
11.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1250 MHz
Base Clock
-
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
786 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GT216
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
GPU Variant
N10P-GS
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
