Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +36028%
14.09 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

475W
TDP
18W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy