Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1250MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5300M +30%
3.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
100.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
6.400 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
3.200 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
TU117
Navi 14 PRO XLM
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy