Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 205W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700 +1565%
8.663 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1880 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
400
144
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

120.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
270.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
17.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.663 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
541.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

205W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy