Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +2291%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GT216
Navi 24
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy