Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2040MHz vs 1203MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +27%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2016
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GM206S
Navi 24
GPU Variant
950 OEM
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy