Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +3033%
3.133 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 24
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy