Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 121% (2040MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +65%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy