AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (2040MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
3.133 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+97%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1512 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
12
RT Cores
20
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
GA107
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
