Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +5493%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV620
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy