Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FirePro W5000

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FirePro W5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +1306%
17.82 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy