Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +4193%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
3840
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
28
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy