Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2087MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +26%
16.03 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
3840
Shading Units
4480
240
TMUs
280
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy