Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +2837%
12.19 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 33
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy