AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (2525MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 281W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
+1488%
45.25 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1895 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2525 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
70
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4480
Shading Units
896
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
323.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
707.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
90.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
45.25 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
1414 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
281W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
TU117
Navi 31
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
