Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +16423%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
192
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GK107
Navi 31
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
38W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy