Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1219MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +186%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
26W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Oland
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy