Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +76%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2008
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT200B
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy