Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +766%
1.248 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV630
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy