Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +127%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2016
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Tonga
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy