CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
+289%
6.451 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
VS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
Graphics Card
Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
640
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU104
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
TU104-150-KC-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
3
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
4
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
5
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FireGL V5600
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X
7
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy