AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 5100 and a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1086MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 5100
+430%
3.892 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
713 MHz
Base Clock
-
1086 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
34.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
121.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
3.892 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
243.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK107
Polaris 10 PRO GL
(215-0876144)
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
