Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 230W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV380
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Rage 9
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy