Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +16696%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV620
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy