Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +1622%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
480
224
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Turks
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy