Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +23788%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy