Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +48763%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
3584
Shading Units
8
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G98
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy