Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +1418%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Dec 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy