Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +6078%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3650
0.174 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
120
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.900 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.800 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
174.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV635
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy