Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV560
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy