Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 9100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 9100 +27211%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy