AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock600MHz
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
+69%
0.154 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2016
Release Date
Apr 2010
Stoney Ridge
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
128
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
153.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Stoney
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
