Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800 +3%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
400
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy