Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM +32%
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jul 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
144
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy