AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+856%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
